Prediction of Jonathan Ho vs Gabe Tishman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Ho vs G. Tishman

Jonathan Ho

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$990

Career Money

Ambidextrous

Plays

Gabe Tishman

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$990

Career Money

Ambidextrous

Plays

Head-to-head: Ho 1 - 0 Tishman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Jonathan Ho winning 2 and Gabe Tishman winning 1. The last match between Jonathan Ho and Gabe Tishman was at the USA F25, 25-07-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Jonathan Ho getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ho	1
Tishman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) USA F25(07-25-16)

Stats

Jonathan Ho

Gabe Tishman

J. Ho vs G. Tishman H2H Profile

J. Ho	Stats	G. Tishman
$990	Career Prize Money	$0
52.73% (58-52)	Career Total W/L	46.15% (6-7)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Ho vs G. Tishman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jonathan Ho has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gabe Tishman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jonathan Ho, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gabe Tishman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jonathan Ho has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gabe Tishman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jonathan Ho has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Gabe Tishman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jonathan Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 23/18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/6). Gabe Tishman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 4/3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/4).
Player level: In the last year, Jonathan Ho has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Gabe Tishman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jonathan Ho winning 1 times and Gabe Tishman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jonathan Ho winning 2 and Gabe Tishman winning 1.
The last match between Jonathan Ho and Gabe Tishman was at the USA F25, 25-07-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Jonathan Ho getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jonathan Ho has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Gabe Tishman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jonathan Ho has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gabe Tishman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jonathan Ho has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gabe Tishman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jonathan Ho vs Gabe Tishman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Ho vs G. Tishman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Ho	Stats	G. Tishman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Ho Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Portugal F11 (Povoa de Varzim) - 10-07-2017
Q3 Antonio Cembellin PrietoA. Cembellin	L	3-6 6-1 6-0	Stats
Q1 Manuel AlmeidaM. Almeida	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
USA F22 (Pittsburgh) - 26-06-2017
R1 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-2 4-6 6-3	Stats
USA F19 (Winston-Salem) - 19-06-2017
R1 Christopher EubanksC. Eubanks	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
USA F17 (Winston-Salem) - 12-06-2017
R1 Wil SpencerW. Spencer	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

G. Tishman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USA F25 - 25-07-2016
Q1 Jonathan HoJ. Ho	L	6-7(5) 6-4 6-4	Stats
USA F24 - 18-07-2016
Q1 George GoldhoffG. Goldhoff	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
USA F23 - 27-07-2015
Q1 John LambleJ. Lamble	L	6-4 4-6 6-0	Stats
USA F22 - 20-07-2015
Q1 Grant GoldinG. Goldin	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q2 Joseph W. Van MeterJ. W.	W	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Ho vs G. Tishman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Ho	Stats	G. Tishman
52.73% (58/52)	YTD Win/Loss	46.15% (6/7)
53.23% (132/116)	Sets Win/Loss	46.67% (14/16)
52.13% (1177/1081)	Games Win/Loss	45.00% (117/143)
51.72% (30/28)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (2/4)
56.10% (23/18)	Clay Win/Loss	57.14% (4/3)
45.45% (5/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0
92	Aces Total	0
0.11	Double Faults Per Game	0
116	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
340.01	Average Opponent Rank	200.46
51% (856/1680)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
69% (589/856)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
45% (369/824)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
41% (54/131)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
37% (610/1637)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
33.33% (1/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
41.67% (5/7)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
54.74% (52/43)	Futures W/L	46.15% (6/7)
52% (57/109)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	42% (5/12)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
59% (16/27)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	100% (2/2)
41% (12/29)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (1/3)
90% (58/52)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (6/5)
10% (58/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (6/1)
12% (52/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (7/1)